How to Install and Uninstall binutils-devel.x86_64 Package on CentOS 8 / RHEL 8

Last updated: February 05,2025

1. Install "binutils-devel.x86_64" package

This guide let you learn how to install binutils-devel.x86_64 on CentOS 8 / RHEL 8


    
        
            $
        

        
            
                sudo dnf update
            
                    
    
    Copied


    
        
            $
        

        
            
                sudo dnf install
            
                        
                binutils-devel.x86_64
            
                    
    
    Copied

2. Uninstall "binutils-devel.x86_64" package

This guide covers the steps necessary to uninstall binutils-devel.x86_64 on CentOS 8 / RHEL 8:


    
        
            $
        

        
            
                sudo dnf remove
            
                        
                binutils-devel.x86_64
            
                    
    
    Copied


    
        
            $
        

        
            
                sudo dnf autoremove
            
                    
    
    Copied

3. Information about the binutils-devel.x86_64 package on CentOS 8 / RHEL 8

Last metadata expiration check: 1 day, 3:54:18 ago on Sun May 9 13:03:46 2021.
Available Packages
Name : binutils-devel
Version : 2.30
Release : 79.el8
Architecture : x86_64
Size : 1.0 M
Source : binutils-2.30-79.el8.src.rpm
Repository : appstream
Summary : BFD and opcodes static and dynamic libraries and header files
URL : https://sourceware.org/binutils
License : GPLv3+
Description : This package contains BFD and opcodes static and dynamic libraries.
:
: The dynamic libraries are in this package, rather than a separate
: base package because they are actually linker scripts that force
: the use of the static libraries. This is because the API of the
: BFD library is too unstable to be used dynamically.
:
: The static libraries are here because they are now needed by the
: dynamic libraries.
:
: Developers starting new projects are strongly encouraged to consider
: using libelf instead of BFD.