How to Install and Uninstall binutils-devel.x86_64 Package on Rocky Linux 9

Last updated: November 28,2024

1. Install "binutils-devel.x86_64" package

Please follow the step by step instructions below to install binutils-devel.x86_64 on Rocky Linux 9


    
        
            $
        

        
            
                sudo dnf update
            
                    
    
    Copied


    
        
            $
        

        
            
                sudo dnf install
            
                        
                binutils-devel.x86_64
            
                    
    
    Copied

2. Uninstall "binutils-devel.x86_64" package

Here is a brief guide to show you how to uninstall binutils-devel.x86_64 on Rocky Linux 9:


    
        
            $
        

        
            
                sudo dnf remove
            
                        
                binutils-devel.x86_64
            
                    
    
    Copied


    
        
            $
        

        
            
                sudo dnf autoremove
            
                    
    
    Copied

3. Information about the binutils-devel.x86_64 package on Rocky Linux 9

Last metadata expiration check: 0:44:05 ago on Fri Feb 16 06:49:52 2024.
Available Packages
Name : binutils-devel
Version : 2.35.2
Release : 42.el9
Architecture : x86_64
Size : 4.0 M
Source : binutils-2.35.2-42.el9.src.rpm
Repository : appstream
Summary : BFD and opcodes static and dynamic libraries and header files
URL : https://sourceware.org/binutils
License : GPLv3+
Description : This package contains BFD and opcodes static and dynamic libraries.
:
: The dynamic libraries are in this package, rather than a separate
: base package because they are actually linker scripts that force
: the use of the static libraries. This is because the API of the
: BFD library is too unstable to be used dynamically.
:
: The static libraries are here because they are now needed by the
: dynamic libraries.
:
: Developers starting new projects are strongly encouraged to consider
: using libelf instead of BFD.